One Difference between Law and Politics

To me, education is not just the matter of financial livelihood and social status, but why education is needed? Whether the provided education is authentic, what the lacks or loopholes of education are and to the final stage: would education make the absorbers immortal? These are some of the questions and rhetoric that make me view education very differently from those of my peers and even my parents and lecturers.

Law and Politics are usually confused with one another and cannot be meticulously separated from each other; as we usually hear the Faculty of Law and Politics, Center for Political and Legal Tuition, Professor of Law and Politics, etc. These are the facts that initiate me an idea to bring the core difference between Law and Politics and put it on a public display. The core difference would help the student to deeper understand the subject matters.

Do you have such the wonder? If no, start to make yourself curious about the core difference between Law and Politics to initiate your mental vocation and if yes, this is an article to unveil you a unique difference between Law and Politics to make you deeply understand.

As a student of Law, newspaper columnist, expert author, media liaison officer, legal and political assistant, I have found one complete differences between Law and Politics. This difference is "the interpretation."

Most students of Law and Politics do not know that the most important theme of their education is "the interpretation." Why I dare to say this? Up to the present, we have billions of sources ranking from books and international media publication to the abstract sources, but these so-called information will not make us a true political analyst or lawyer.

What we are seeing on these sources is just "plain information", so what are these information are. If information is just all about information, University is not needed, because most of these sources are available everywhere and even free. The things that we have not found on these sources are "the interpretation" or the path to interpretational secretes. Let's now jump up to the very core of our article.

Legal interpretation must be "within": in interpreting the law, the lawyer of any party or the conflicting parties themselves cannot interpret the law out of the law being enforced in the country where the trial is being heard. This may seem very vague and let us bring an example to clarify. If you commit or are accused of committing a crime in the country in which you are residing in, you or your lawyer are not entitled to interpret the law out of the laws being enforced in your residing country. To a stricter extent, the laws being used for interpretation must circumnavigate the crime that you did or are accused of committing. This case is different from "political interpretation."

Law and Politics may be equally broad, but interpretation in politics is much broader than in legal one. Have you ever noticed that a political analyst for a university in America would use approach in political interpretation by drawing examples from any country, any sources and any celebrities in the world. Political interpretation (analysis) is not as "within" as in law.

Politics is much more flexible and so much softer than law. Other merits why politics allow much broader interpretation, because we even see a huge similarities between socialist and capitalist states (similar political application), but the laws in these two separate kinds of state are totally different. I know the last one sentence is too vague for you, but let's start the legal and political interpretation.

Ethics - Law and Citizenship

Laws are not self-enforcing. Those to whom they are directed need to understand what they mean to them. Parliament generally just passes laws and then expects others to communicate their content - generally through the media, specifically when individuals seek legal advice, and diffusely through word of mouth. Good legislative practice should consider the means by which the content is communicated.

Ethics and integrity bodies within line agencies, particularly those with a high potential for corruption

o A process for appointing special commissions of investigation in which the commissioners are appointed by a bi-partisan process

o An independent audit office

o A local government oversight office

o Free and fair elections

o An empowered community

In addition to the above 'government' institutions, it is also important that other institutions be present and active in playing their roles. Each of these should have their own integrity system to maximize the chance that they will fulfill their functions within the national integrity system/ethics regime and live up to the justifications for the various privileges that they generally possess:

o An independent bar

o A free and diverse press

o Active professions -especially journalists and lawyers

o Active nongovernmental organizations

o Independent academic institutions

Political parties play a critical role in the operation of democracies. By putting alternative agendas to the electorate and being responsible for their delivery, they are a necessary part of any integrity system. However, they also provide some of greatest opportunities for corruption. It is thus critical that integrity systems are in place to maximize the chances that they play that critical role, rather than act as a conduit through which cash can corrupt government policy and trump democracy.

The answers include a mix of measures to reduce the reliance on political donations and to make those that remain transparent! The real problem of political donations is posed when we ask the simple question: would rational donors give donations without an expectation of return? Where donors are corporations who otherwise insist on their sole responsibility to increase shareholder wealth, a 'yes' answer makes one wonder how they believe they are increasing the wealth of their shareholders!

The institutional means to ensure that political parties play their role need constant updating to deal with those who will seek to get around them. The temptations to abuse are so great that ethical.

This transparency may have to go so far as all meetings between donors and either party officials or members of political parties holding political office and appointees of political parties.

However, it is necessary to emphasize the central role of ethics in this issue to co-ordinate legal and institutional reform. Politicians should be conscious of the critical role they play in a democracy and seek to live up to that role and make the subversion of that role a major issue.

Holographic Projection Technologies and Political Outcry on Pornography

We see in the media that many politicians and religious groups are completely fed up with the violence, vulgar language and pornography in video games, on TV and on the radio. In fact, the Federal Communication Commission has been hot on the trail trying to alleviate some of this anger. Many congressmen, senators and even presidential hopefuls have used this as a campaign issue as they stand on the podium and tell us how they will solve the world's problems.

What about the next technology wave of the future? What about holographic projection technologies, surely these will be used for such things as pornography? Will we see more political outcry? This potential problem should be easy to see in the future for instance there is the darker side to such things - Holographic Adult Entertainment, which ought to bring in quite a few dollars to the infamous porn industry.

Holographic projection technologies will be used in these dastardly endeavors and will probably also be used in advertising, as the Entertainment Turns into Advertising? Nevertheless folks want their entertainment and they are willing to pay for that desire. Should we set up regulations now to prevent holographic technology from being used by the pornography industry or will demand be so high there is no way to stop?

Who is to say that we should make laws against what someone may do in their own home and yet we know that this causes problems in our society and that pornography is also considered an addiction by many psychologists. And what about consenting adults with long-distance holographic phone sex - surely it will be used for that as well. Should we prevent it before it starts? Should we make regulations against the technology which is not even on the market yet?

Many mothers and church groups believe that we should do something before we have the big problem, like we did with videogames. The question is; you are a voter also and so we should ask you - what do you think we should do? We know there is always big money available for Research and Development of any technology that has a killer entertainment application. From Xbox to the new iPods, we have seen this technology trend for decades. The future should be obvious and there are some things we will not be able to stop, should we give it a try anyway?

Renewable Energy Laws - Current Laws and Proposed Laws For the Future For Most of the Western World

Like everything in life, there are a number of laws that govern the use of both renewable and non-renewable resources. All law is the same really - laws are what are known as the primary authorities such as case law, statutes, rules and regulations. In terms of renewable energy law you may hear about policies or politics of energy, these too will be discussed in detail here.

In the U.S. energy is regulated through the United States Department of Energy. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 is a bill that was passed on July 25 2005 and it stated that the country needed to do something about the growing energy problems and the US Energy Policy changed from this point forward. Tax incentives were provided as were loan guarantees for anyone taking part in finding alternative energy sources. The Energy Policy Act is the key piece of renewable energy law.

As part of renewable energy law, a production tax credit (PTC) was included in the 2005 cornerstone policy as an incentive for domestic wind power technologies. Investors can claim for 10 years a 1.9-cent-per-kilowatt-our deduction. This is actually one of the things that drove the growth of the wind industry here in the United States. Currently, our wind industry is growing faster than any other developed country. The government included this in the bill because they could see it being effective, but not only has it been effective it has been very low cost as well. A renewable energy law such as this is required in order to boost the renewable energy economy. It is important that the government continues with an incentive such as this so that the industry will continue to grow.

Not only did the Energy Policy Act of 2005 allow wind energy to develop, but it also put geothermal power on the map too. As well as having a production tax credit, (PTC) Geothermal power received increased funding and support from a number of federal agencies.

In 2007 renewable energy law was discussed in a number of pieces of legislation but nothing was made into a law. At least noise was made, and congress is now aware that legislation will be questioned again. However, further energy bills have been passed since then and they have stated that the Department of Energy will spend no less than $95m annually in research and development into geothermal energy.

The renewable energy law also takes marine energy into consideration. Marine energy involves using the power of the waves and the tides to generate electricity. As part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Department of Energy was required to consider ocean energy in its group of alternative energy sources. After this act was passed, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) looked into developing projects involving wave and tidal technology. A number of projects have been started up in the United States the biggest ones being in New York, San Francisco Bay, Rhode Island and Washington State.

The great thing about renewable energy law is that it forces congress to do something about alternatives to energy sources. In five years since this bill was passed, there has been so much research and development down into these alternative sources that the general population is considering these options over more traditional fossil fueled power sources.